|
Welcome, ladies and gents, to the first VOID award of 2008. I know it has been awhile since I have given one of these out, but I don’t want to just give them out willy-nilly. The VOID (Validation Of Incogitable Dumbassery, in case you didn’t know) is only for those special few who go above and beyond the levels of average stupidity to the level where your jaw hits the floor and the your brain does flips trying to figure out how someone can be so wrong.
Alas, with the writer’s strike going on, I cannot put on the usual red carpeted award show I normally do. So in the style of The Golden Globes, let’s just get on with the award.
Today’s VOID goes to Kevin McCullough, columnist for Townhall.com and author of “The MuscleHead Revolution: Overturning Liberalism with Commonsense(sic) Thinking”. Now I’ve always heard the term “muscle head” as an insult to people who are more brawn than brain, but, judging by Kevin’s picture, he appears to have neither.
I’m not here to award Kevin the VOID for his book though, instead I wish to award him for his lack of research when writing an article about the game “Mass Effect”. For those who do now know, “Mass Effect” is an action role-playing game by Bioware (makers of Neverwinter Nights and KOTOR), and it is a game that has garnered some attention for having a love scene in it. Kevin has heard about this, and blown it to completely outrageous levels in his article ‘The “Sex-Box” Race for President”. Befroe you go any farther here, you should go read it; it’s okay, I’ll wait for you….
Done? Okay, let’s continue then.
Now I know what you are thinking, ‘what a tool’, right? Well, it’s not even that article this award is for, it’s his response to the hundred of comments pointing out the inaccuracies in his article that earns him a VOID. You can go read the whole response, but I am going to post most of it here.
(NOTE: I am not editing any of the content of his post, not for punctuation, grammar, or spelling. Anything wrong in his quotes are his mistakes reproduced here just as he posted them)
1. "The most realistic sex acts..." - from the YouTube footage I saw, I still concur, to me these acts are the most realistic put in video games
This can only be because you have not seen a video game since the NES. This isn’t even the most graphic display in an M rated game, not to mention the unrated games sold for PCs in adult bookstores, or so I’ve heard. I’ve never actually worked up the courage to go into one of those places.
- that I have seen. In the lesbian version one woman's hand appears to stimulate the crotch of the other passing between the legs.
Small point here; there is no actual lesbian version, Liara clearly explains in the game that, while her species is feminine in appearance, and do behave as women, they have no gender in their species. There is no male or female, and as such no homosexuality is possible (Or only Homosexuality is possibility without going outside the species, depending on how you want to look at it).
Larger point; the Liara/Female-Shepard version of the scene is exactly the same as the Liara/Male-Shepard, Ashley/Male-Shepard, etc versions, and neither I, nor my wife, saw any hands stimulating any crotches, although there may have been a buttock caress while still clothed.
Today many of the more perv-oriented gamer-nerds took delight in describing for me the detailed description of games they claim are MORE realistic... Ok fine, I'll take them at their word, but for me the statement stands...
So his position, based on pure ignorance, stands because he will not accept that he is incorrect when the facts are explained to him in painful detail.
2. "One can custom design the shape, form, bodies, race, hair style, breast size of the images..." Evidently the only thing I got wrong on this was the breast size,
Well, if by “shape, form” you refer only to the face, then yes. You can adjust skin colour, so that would include race.
though I would like someone to explain to me how the female characters end up having different sizes again on the YouTube footage I witnessed with my own eyes... But the rest of it was true. race, hair style, color - etc.
They end up looking different because they are different characters. The player only controls the appearance of Commander Shepard, not every character in the game. This is not The Sims (which can be modded to actually be what he describes, but Maxis/EA should not be held responsible for how users modify the game), you do not control the appearance and actions of every character in the game.
3. “...the video game "persons" hump in every form, format, multiple, gender-oriented possibility they can think of.”
I originally read this as “you can think of”, which is of course very different than “they (presumably the characters in the game) can think of” since the characters in the game follow a script and do not think at all.
Again true (not that there are that many combinations of human sexuality to begin with.)
It would seem that Mr. McCullough does not have much imagination.
But since the makers of Mass Effect decided to throw in a little alien booty both hetero and homo it seems to me that they covered the range. Would these gamer-nerds have preferred that the game included bestiality?
Technically, wouldn’t the alien on human count as bestiality?
Later in the column I make a reference to being able to perform sex acts, homo and hetero, with whomever... Ok - you can't have sex with every single character in the game...
In fact you can only complete the romance subplot with one of two characters, depending on what gender you make Shepard; Ashley or Liara as a male, Kaidan or Liara as a female. You know how I know this despite only having played all the way through as a male? Research!
But between copulating with Aliens, girl on girl, guy on girl, and according to my gamer-nerd friends who I checked with
“Friends” you obviously hold in high regard to refer to them as what you have described as “sexually repressed” and “perv-oriented”.
- it does not take a great deal of manipulation to add a few extra "kinks" to the mix for those who know a little bit about such things.
Okay, I need some detail here. Does he mean hacking the game somehow? I can see it being easily done on a PC version, but not on the X-Box version. I would have to label this a put-up-or-shut-up moment, and request McCullough explain what he means by “manipulation”.
4. They (the gamer-nerds)
His friends?
also took outrageous umbrage to the claims I made in the column that the game is marketed to teen-age boys. (Though many of those giving me feedback happened to be under the age of 17/18.) The common argument is that because the game is marked "M" that means that no kid under 17/18 (depending on your state) would be allowed access to it. Asinine thinking through and through though. Simply like the fact that movie theaters are this night allowing children underage to purchase tickets, refusing to ask for ID, these games are being sold over the counter by the major chain stores with no enforcement of the age limit suggestions posted on the games themselves. The Gamer-Nerds act as though the packaging itself is all the responsibility that needs to be taken. Of course they themselves probably started hiding their collection of Hustler Magazine under their beds when they were eleven and have thus a good idea of how the "letter of the law" differs from the "intent." Thus the explanation of why they were so sore with me for pointing out the obvious. The silly "M" label stands for, and accomplishes precious little.
You get that straw man, Kevin! I believe the point in people pointing out the M rating to Kevin was that, like movies, the game is clearly marked as to what age it is appropriate for so parents can make that decision for themselves. No one should believe that an M rating will stop minors from getting the game, but it will alert any parent who cares at all about what their kids are exposed to what age it is being marketed towards, which was McCullough’s claim in the first place.
5. The major criticism the Gamer-Nerds had for me in their reaction was this challenge: "Unless you've spent the 20 hours of game time it takes to get to the explicit scenes, keep your fat mouth shut!" Many challenges stated that unless I played it myself then I had no business pointing out its objectionably content.
Still many more suggested Kevin a little research and see what people who knew what the hell they were talking about had to say. It’s not difficult to find accurate information about this game, you just need to Google search it and read a review from any of hundreds of sources. He did not do that though, and instead he comes across looking a total fool to anyone who knows the truth. The problem is that there are plenty of mouth breathers who read his blog and columns who take everything he says as truth.
Would they say the same of a strip club at the end of their block or hookers knocking at their door?
Where does he live? I’ve never had a hooker knock at my door.
(Well maybe sexually repressed gamer-nerds would...) Normal people would not. There is an innate instinct that tells us right from wrong, it's called a conscience.
And it’s too bad Kevin doesn’t have one, or it would have told him to admit he was wrong, that he was irresponsible in his writing, and was fundamentally dishonest in his attempt to further his agenda. If I were called out for being that horrifically wrong about an article, I would retract it and apologize for it.
Did I play the game? No. Did I talk to some gamers who had and who knew the possibilities of the game. Yes!
Then that would mean he was just flat out lying in his original article, as anyone who had actually played the game would have told him that he was wrong on nearly every assertion about the game.You have to remember that McCullough originally described this game as a sex-simulator. He stated that you could design all the characters and make them have on-screen sex in any position you want. This is not a case of being a little bit wrong, this is outright misrepresentation of what the game is about, something he accused Bioware of.
Does it make the lesbian, alien, hetero, homo sex that a player arrives at in the game a proper thing for teenagers to be tantalized by? Absolutely not!
This is true. Luckily “Mass Effect” does not fit that description. The love scene is the same as you would see in any number of movies. Hell, the love scene in “The Terminator” was more graphic. “Mass Effect” shows a couple of seconds of buttock, some side-boob, and suddenly you’re fully dressed again, and you can see your nude partner from the back above the waist. The Sims taking a shower is more erotic.
Midway through the column I turn to a vision
Fantasy
of where such games will lead to in the future, more games using sex as an enticement, more vivid graphics, more, more, more... That is what gamers ascribe to right? Alternate universes where they can escape this world and become caught up in the pursuit of whatever...
Of course you can get the same effect from a book (and my imagination has much better graphics than X-Box 360).
The over-arching point of the entire piece, was not even to encourage censorship - though we ARE allowed to censor smut in this nation, and it has been defined already by the Supreme Court.
And if you were to review that definition, I’m sure you would see that “Mass Effect” does not qualify.
(Thus why we are not Europe with our "blue" channel running on broadcast television nightly.)
That’s nothing to be proud of. Being puritanical when in comes to nudity is not one of America’s finer points. If you look back to your bible, you’ll recall that God got mightily pissed off at Adam and Eve for covering up. It’s the covering up of the body that sexualizes it. You take God’s creation and make it smutty that way. If God wanted us clothed, we would have been born that way… like dogs.
The real point of the piece was however to say that in the election coming up the next President will preside over a society that does more to push the envelope than any that have come before it.
Bollocks! Every generation pushes the envelope. Every generation, as it ages, says things were better when they were kids. The skies were bluer, bread was cheaper, children respected their elders, there was no violence, etc. McCullough’s generation is no different, and neither shall mine be.
That society does so at our peril.
Society also does so at its benefit. Pushing the envelope is why we know the world is round, we know the Earth revolves around the sun, and we can get yogurt in a tube… okay, maybe it’s not all good.
Look, if the Gamer-Nerds need their pervy outlets to find true release and inner peace - then make them drive to the outskirts of town
Translation: It’s something I don’t like, so people who do like it should be punished.
It’s amazing how people like McCullough are happy to censor what they don’t like, but if you dare speak out against Michael Weiner or Rush Limbaugh it’s suddenly violating the first amendment (yes, I know there’s a touch of straw man there)
and be forced to frequent those places that no one wants in the community to get them.
Wal-Mart?
By properly removing sexually explicit material from Best Buy, Circuit City, and Wal-Mart
Oh
we take a step (one that did not need to be explained only a few years ago) in pushing back against the tidal wave of trashy cheap sex that society has ruled harmless, and thus meaningless.
We take a step against free speech by classifying speech we disagree with (or just don’t understand) as offensive.
God didn't design it that way, and no matter how many gamer-nerds spam my inbox with profane dreams of seeing my dead corpse sodimized...
I'm not moving!
I would expect nothing else from someone with rocks for brains.
If you took the time to read Kevin’s original article, and some of the responses, you have seen how his rebuttal to the hundreds of messages his post generated avoided many of the more valid points while twisting the ones he did respond to. Sure, there was plenty of idiots proving Kev’s point about ‘Gamer-Nerds’, but there were also plenty explaining to him why he was wrong.
While Kevin may be a lost cause, it is his readers that are the true tragedy; many of them likely believe what he writes without doing any research on their own, or giving time to any other views. After all, if it is published in such a wonderful right wing haven, it must be true. Only Liberals ever tell lies after all, or that is what must be assumed.
To unashamedly lie to your readers is also an insult, Mr McCullough. You may have many more readers than I do, but you have no respect for them. You make crap up and expect them to believe it without question. I know my readers are at least as smart as I am, and if I put something out there that is composed of such obvious amounts of steer manure I am likely to be called on it. As such, I try to keep it honest, or at least admit when I’m fudging the truth a bit.
So for being a complete mallet-head beyond the call of duty, for ignoring reality when smacked in the face with it, for using willful ignorance as an excuse, for twisting the discussion to make it appear to be about something else, and for showing off the Dumbass Effect, I award Kevin McCullough the first VOID of 2008. Congratulations, Mr. McCullough; may you, and all the people stupid enough to believe anything you say, enjoy your well deserved award.
One final note; I know I said I was going to do a write-up about Christmas, and it’s almost done, this just got my attention over my morning coffee, and I could not let it go. I also have more death stuff to talk about, including the surreality of picking up cremated remains. I make no promises as to when I will post those though.
|